Value Blog

Valuable Answers to Your Business Valuation Questions

12 Jul

A business broker’s prospective – what buyers look for

Posted in General valuation topics on 12.07.10

After speaking to Marty Fishman, a business broker with Transworld Business Brokers, about what buyers are looking for he had the following insights: “Most buyers approach the purchase with a certain level of skepticism. Buyers want solid facts and believable information that a business opportunity is a solid investment. They want information: financial documents, business operation and facility information. Some of this information will be provided prior to an offer and some of it once there has been an executed purchase agreement with contingencies such as the complete and satisfactory review of property, books and records.”

This is in line with the things that I evaluate as a business appraiser that support the value of a business.  Those businesses with good records and documentation of business operations are worth more than businesses that are lacking.  I will go a step further to say, businesses with limited records are significantly less marketable than businesses with good records.

Since buyers approach businesses with skepticism, consistent records are also important.  As a consultant, I advise clients to rely upon tax returns that have been filed with the IRS under penalty of perjury, over hand written documents that track sales.  In cases where cash sales were not reported on a business’s income tax return (or sales tax returns), there may be inadequate documentation of the amount of unreported cash, leaving the buyer with the difficult decision of accepting the seller’s representations on faith.  I advise clients to consider that if a seller was less than truthful in reporting income to the IRS or other taxing authority, how does one know he or she will be truthful in the amount of unreported cash to the buyer.

Mr. Fishman pointed out “The selling and buying of a business is a very complex process. It involves many aspects that most successful business people are not exposed to in day-to-day operation of a company. Both parties should rely on experts trained in the sale of businesses.”

It is important to keep in mind that when you are buying or selling a business, the price is often based on a number of factors, and the buyer and seller may value the business differently.

©2010 Florida Business Valuation Group

Share

tags: , ,

No Comments »

27 May

Is it possible that the assets of a business are worth more than the business itself?

Posted in General valuation topics on 27.05.10

Unfortunately, this is true.  There are times with a business is worth more dead than alive.  The value of a business can be divided between its tangible and intangible assets.  Tangible assets are the physical assets used in business operations such as equipment, real estate and inventory.  Intangible assets include things such as the goodwill and customer lists.

In general, a business is usually worth at least as much as its net assets (assets less liabilities).  A profitable business is usually worth more than its net assets.

Typically, healthy businesses produce a return on both the tangible and intangible asset in the form of profits and cash flow.

When a business is operating at a loss, it may indicate that the intangible assets have little or no value.  However, losses can arise from situations other than diminished goodwill, such as the current recession.

If a company does not have prospects of operating profitably in the future, a rational owner would choose to close the business and sell the assets. At a loss, the company is not producing a return on its tangible or its intangible assets (assuming there are intangible assets.)  However, if the company is expected to rebound, the business can still have value.  In other words, loss companies can still have value.

The challenge is to determine what value a loss company has in excess of its assets.

©2010 Florida Business Valuation Group

Share

tags: , ,

No Comments »

27 Apr

What is a business appraisal review?

Posted in General valuation topics, Valuation dictionary on 27.04.10

I recently earned the ABAR (Accredited for Business Appraisal Review)  designation from the Institute of Business Appraisers.   The ABAR process is not a valuation, but a review of the valuation process.  The resulting business appraisal review opinion states whether the valuation report is credible.

The valuation process  is based on a body of knowledge and generally accepted appraisal practices.  The appraiser applies his or her informed judgment, based on the facts and circumstances related to the business to arrive at an opinion or conclusion of value.  The appraiser then documents the relevant information and explanations, supporting his or her conclusions in a valuation (or appraisal) report.

The business appraisal review process examines the credibility of the valuation work product, looking at the information in the report and the methodologies used.   If a report fails to disclose sufficient information, has analytical gaps or misapplies methodology, it may be found to lack credibility.

There are three types of review opinions:  a finding of concurrence, a finding of non-concurrence and a finding of no opinion.    A finding of concurrence indicates that the report is credible.  When there is insufficient information for the reviewer to issue a review opinion, a finding of no opinion will be issued.

A business appraisal review is not an opinion regarding the value of a business.  It cannot take the place of a full appraisal as a second opinion.

If you have questions regarding when a business appraisal review is needed, you can post or question or email me.

© 2010 Florida Business Valuation Group

Share

tags: , , ,

No Comments »

16 Nov

Why do I need a valuation if I am buying a business?

Posted in General valuation topics, Uncategorized on 16.11.09

The straight answer is you may not.  Unless the transaction is between family members or will be financed with an SBA loan, a valuation is usually not required.

The advantage to a business valuation is it provides the user with the value of a business or interest in that business.  The advantage to a business valuation is also the major limitation.  The business appraiser will usually provide a single value, based either on fair market value or investment value.  (See blog post here)

Value is a range, though, and there are many different types of value within that range.  As a buyer, you are only concerned with the lowest value within that range that you can pay.  If you can negotiate a lower price than fair market value, you will.

Valuations can be expensive.  If one is not necessary for you to negotiate a deal, you should not pay for one.

The seller has established a starting price for your negotiation.  What you need to determine is whether the cash flow from the business can support that price.

Each buyer has different criteria for whether a deal will work for him or her and there is no right answer.  The things that buyers should consider include:

  • What is your risk tolerance?
  • What is your required rate of return?
  • How long are you willing to wait to get your investment back?
  • Will cash flow from the business be sufficient to pay off any debt used to buy the business?
  • Will cash flow from the business be sufficient to pay your salary if you are working in the business?

These questions will provide you will the information to determine if the asking price meets your criteria as a buyer.  A business may be worth $100,000, but a particular buyer may not be able to afford the asking price.

Price is the negotiated amount for a particular transaction.  While you need information to make an informed decision, a valuation will not necessarily give you that information.  Your financial professional should be able to assist you in determining whether the asking price of a business meets your criteria.

© 2009 Florida Business Valuation Group

Share

tags: , , , , ,

No Comments »

06 Aug

Do financial statements reflect the value of a business?

Posted in General valuation topics on 06.08.09

A recent article in the Journal of Accountancy, “Four Options for Measuring Value Creation”, brought up some very good points regarding why the financial statements of a company are flawed as measures of value. The article lists a number of reasons, but top on the list is that value is future oriented, whereas most of the measures on financial statements are historically based. Value is based on anticipated future benefits.

So what does a balance sheet tell you about a business? A balance sheet typically has the historical net cost of the assets a business has acquired over time. The balance sheet does not tell you the type of assets, their age or condition. Older assets may be depreciated and have a very low book value, but still be fully functional in the business. The balance sheet does not indicate what future capital expenses will be to either replace old equipment or to support future growth. Intangible assets, including intellectual property and goodwill, are usually not reflected on the balance sheet even though they may have substantial value.

A balance sheet reports the liabilities of a company. Unless you are reading footnotes to the financial statement (assuming the financial statements have footnotes), the balance sheet usually does not tell you the terms of the liabilities or when they mature. It also does not reflect how old the payables are or whether the company has unused lines of credit. Understanding the obligations of a company is necessary in understanding its value.

Is value better reflected on the income statement of a company? Many people think that profitability, which is reflected on the income statement, the primary element contributing to value. There are two potential problems with this assumption. First profitability is not the same as cash flow. For example, necessary investments in capital expenses for new equipment can impact cash flow while having a minimal impact on profitability. The other issue is the assumption that the level of profitability reported will be sustainable. A business can have increasing sales over a prior year, but if its receivables are increasing at a faster pace, there could either be a problem with collections or the growth may not be sustainable.

Financial statements provide important, but limited information about a company.  Understanding the financial statements is only the beginning in the process of determining the value of a company.

©2009 Florida Business Valuation Group

Share

tags: , , , ,

No Comments »

20 Jul

What does the market approach capture?

Posted in General valuation topics on 20.07.09

The conceptual background behind the market approach is to use the behavior of buyers and sellers to arrive at a multiple which reflects the market.  Market methods can be divided into two basic groups: guideline public companies and private company transactions.

There are some major distinctions between the underlying data used for each method.  The public guideline company method uses information from publicly traded companies that are most similar to the company being valued.  The appraiser’s analysis of comparability may include factors such as type of business, size, geographic operations, growth prospects, past historical operating performance and any other factors which may be appropriate.  The appraiser identifies the most comparable companies and then derives valuation multiples based on the trading prices of the guideline companies’ stock as of the valuation date.  This data is based on marketable, minority interests in the guideline companies.

Private company transaction methodology is generally based on the theory that a sufficient number of private transactions will emulate the market for that type of company.  There are a number of databases which track private transactions of companies.  The information is collected from business brokers and intermediaries involved in the transactions, who report the information to the database services.  Each database contains different amounts of information regarding the companies.  The information about these companies represents a non-marketable, control interest in the transaction companies.

So what is the difference?  The public company transactions are evidence of the market value based on a large number of transactions which have been completed between buyers and sellers.  That is the reason that a large number of public companies is not required in order to use the methodology to arrive at valuation multiples.  Each company alone is evidence of the market.

Private company transactions may or may not take place at market value. Buyers and sellers have their own motivations for entering into transactions.   There is only one transaction for each company, unlike with public companies where you could have anywhere from under one million to over 250 million trades in a single day.  The concept behind private company transaction methodology is that with a sufficient number of transactions, the average or mid-point will represent what the market looks like.  That is why more transactions are necessary under the private company transaction methodology.  A few transactions may not be sufficient to represent the market.

What is important to understand is that each valuation is different. Applying any methodology is based on the facts and circumstances particular to the company being valued and the valuation date.

©2009 Florida Business Valuation Group

Share

tags: , , , , ,

No Comments »

11 Jun

Does a single transaction represent market value?

Posted in General valuation topics on 11.06.09

One of the approaches to valuing a business is the market approach.  This approach looks to either private transactions or publicly traded stock to develop an indicator of value, usually in the form of a multiple.   Is a single transaction representative of the value in the market?

With public companies, the marketplace allows for buyers and sellers to negotiate each transaction by using bidding system.  A buyer will indicate what he wants to pay for a stock and a seller will indicate what he wants to sell the stock for.  When buyers and sellers are matched, there is a sale.  The public stock exchanges provide an efficient system for trades.

When a public guideline company method is used to value a business, comparable companies are identified and the information from the market is used to develop a market value.  Because the data captures the prices paid in the market, it is considered to be a good proxy of fair market value.  Since there are many transactions for each company, it is not necessary that an appraiser use a large number of comparable publicly traded companies in applying this methodology.  (The IRS heavily favors using publicly traded companies as a basis for value in developing opinions of value.)

When comparable publicly traded companies are not available, we look to private markets.  Private markets are no where near as efficient as publicly traded markets.  Often, limited information is available about the sale and the company operations.  Private companies are not require to report information and most information available is from database services that collect the information from brokers and intermediaries.

Since private markets are not efficient, the sales prices usually reflect an investment value rather than fair market value.

With all these challenges, how do we use these private transactions to develop indicators of fair market value?  Using private transactions is based on the concept that when transactions for similar companies are looked at together, these values represent the market as a whole.  The values for companies sold at distressed prices offset the values for companies sold at premiums, resulting in a market value.

Since the private transaction methodology relies upon a group of transactions to extrapolate multiples representative of the entire market, it is necessary to have a sufficient number of transactions to achieve this.  The problem is there is no absolute number.  We know that you need more than five transactions to get a statistically valid multiple.  Most agree that you need more than ten transactions.  The obvious answer is the more the better. With more transactions, an appraiser is better able to analyze the data into groups and arrive at a multiple based on factors that are similar to the company being valued.

While a single transaction price may be representative of fair market value, it is not sufficient to prove fair market value.  Remember price does not necessary equal value.  Price is the negotiated amount at which a transaction takes place and can be influenced by non-market factors.

For more information on the market approach, click here.

©2009 Florida Business Valuation Group

Share

tags: , , , , , ,

No Comments »

14 May

Rules of thumb: Why they may not reflect value.

Posted in General valuation topics on 14.05.09

A rule of thumb is defined in the International Glossary of Business Valuation Terms as “a mathematical formula developed from the relationship between price and certain variables based on experience, observation, hearsay, or a combination of these; usually industry specific.”  Typically they are representative of the average price paid in an industry.  So, it would appear that using a rule of thumb would provide a good estimate of the value of a company. Should Company B still be worth twice as much as Company A?

It is the appraiser’s job to look at the facts and circumstances of a particular business operation in arriving at a value.  This includes establishing how the business compares to others within its industry.  Rules of thumb are not a recognized valuation method because often there is insufficient information available about how the multiples were developed.  Some rules of thumb are supported by market data, and others are not.

If you are interested in researching rules of thumb for a particular industry there are a number of sources:

  • 2009 Business Reference Guide, published by Business Brokers Press (www.bbpinc.com)
  • Handbook of Small Business Valuation Formulas and Rules of Thumb/Third Edition by Glenn Desmond, published by Valuation Press, 1994.
  • How to Value over 100 Closely Held Businesses, Fourth Edition, by Stephen M. Zamucen, MBA, CPA, CVA, ABV, CFE, published by The National Alliance of Consultants, Valuers and Analysts, 2002.
  • Handbook of Business Valuation, Second Edition, edited by Thomas L. West and Jeffrey D. Jones, published by John Wiley & Sons, 1999.

Additional information is sometimes available from industry trade groups.

Use caution when using rules of thumb as some of them are dated and may not reflect current industry or economic conditions.

© 2009 Florida Business Valuation Group

Share

tags: , , , , , , ,

No Comments »